Skip to content

Workflow Building Agent

The Workflow Building Agent, powered by Compass AI, turns how work is actually done into a structured portfolio of automatable tasks. Point it at your existing process documentation and it returns discrete tasks, each with a business objective and measurable KPIs already attached.

The blank page is the real blocker

Most AI programmes do not stall on technology. They stall because nobody can say which work should be automated first, or how anyone would know it worked.

Teams either automate whatever is easiest to describe, or spend a quarter in workshops before a single agent exists. You can start decomposing real workflows immediately rather than waiting for an audit to conclude.

What it does

Captures tacit knowledge

Upload a domain-expert interview or existing process documentation. The agent reads how the work is really performed, including the judgement steps that never made it into the written procedure.

Decomposes the workflow

Identify the data sources and application endpoints, then work towards the middle to find the tasks between them. Each task should be a single model operation; chaining them forms the workflow.

Marks the human checkpoints

Decomposition also identifies where a person must authorise the next step, so semi-autonomous execution is designed in rather than bolted on.

Sets business-aligned objectives

Each proposed task arrives with a stated business objective rather than a technical description, so the value case is legible to whoever signs off.

Attaches KPIs from day one

Success metrics are generated with the task, which makes evaluation possible from the first run instead of being retrofitted after deployment.

What a task actually contains

Decomposition produces more than a list of steps. Each task is a specification that Endeavor Studio can prototype directly.

The anatomy of an Endeavor task
ElementPurpose
Input and output schemasDefine what the task accepts and returns, so tasks can chain reliably
Attachment definitionsDeclare any images or documents that travel with the input
Model selectionChoose the provider and model per task, on cost and performance
Model parametersTemperature and sampling controls that set determinism versus creativity
Prompt templatesGenerate prompts dynamically from structured input
Tool capabilitiesThe MCP tools the task is permitted to call
Evaluation metricsHow success is measured before the task is trusted

From friction to a testable agent

Bring the process

An interview transcript, an SOP, a runbook, or a description of where work jams. No prior AI design required.

Get a task portfolio

A ranked set of candidate tasks with objectives and KPIs, ready to hand to Endeavor Studio for prototyping.

Keep the expert in the loop

The people who know the work shape the decomposition, so what gets automated matches what actually happens.

Knowing when not to use a model

Part of good decomposition is recognising which tasks should not be a model call at all. Work that must produce the same output for the same input, or that runs at a volume where token cost dominates, is better served by deterministic code or a purpose-built model — named entity recognition, for instance, is often better handled by a dedicated extraction model than a general one.

Surfacing that choice early is what keeps a programme economical.

Why this stage decides the outcome

  • Tasks defined with KPIs can be scored; tasks defined without them can only be argued about.
  • Small tasks make governance approval fast rather than fraught.
  • Business objectives attached early mean the ROI case is ready before deployment.
  • Starting from real process documents avoids automating an idealised workflow nobody follows.
  • It is the first stage of the Accountability Cycle, and it feeds every stage after it.

Frequently asked questions

What does the Workflow Building Agent do?

Powered by Compass AI, it reads your existing process documentation and domain-expert interviews and decomposes the workflow into discrete, automatable tasks, each with a business objective and KPIs attached.

What do we need to provide?

An interview transcript, a standard operating procedure, a runbook, or a description of where work currently jams. No prior AI design is required.

Why does decomposition matter so much?

A task should be a single model operation with defined input and output schemas. Tasks at that granularity can be tested, scored, versioned, and approved individually - which is what makes governance fast rather than fraught.

How does it decide what should not be automated with AI?

Not every task should use a model. Work that must be deterministic, has strictly defined input, or runs at a volume that makes model calls uneconomic is better implemented as code or a purpose-built model. Compass AI surfaces the choice rather than defaulting to a model for everything.

What happens after decomposition?

The task portfolio moves into Endeavor Studio for prototyping, where each task gets model selection, prompt templates, tool capabilities, and evaluation metrics, and multiple versions compete.